Credits to CBS News
The relationship between a defense attorney and their client is based on trust, confidentiality, and the expectation that the attorney will act in the best interests of their client. However, in rare cases, defense attorneys have turned on their clients, either by revealing confidential information, betraying their trust, or taking actions that are contrary to their clients’ interests.
One example of a defense attorney turning on their client is the case of Gideon v. Wainwright. In this landmark case, which was decided by the Supreme Court in 1963, the court held that indigent defendants have a right to appointed counsel in criminal cases. The case was brought by Clarence Earl Gideon, who had been charged with breaking and entering a Florida pool hall in 1961.
Gideon was initially forced to represent himself at trial, as he could not afford an attorney. He was convicted and sentenced to five years in prison. However, he continued to maintain his innocence and filed a handwritten petition to the Supreme Court, arguing that his constitutional rights had been violated by the lack of counsel.
The Supreme Court agreed to hear Gideon’s case and appointed Abe Fortas, a prominent defense attorney, to represent him. Fortas argued that Gideon’s conviction should be overturned and that he was entitled to a new trial with the assistance of counsel. The court ultimately agreed, and Gideon was granted a new trial, at which he was represented by counsel and acquitted of the charges.
Despite his success in representing Gideon, Fortas later faced controversy and criticism for his actions in representing another client, Louis Wolfson. Wolfson was a wealthy businessman who had been convicted of securities fraud in the 1950s. Fortas, who had previously represented Wolfson in a civil case, was asked by President Lyndon B. Johnson to help secure a pardon for Wolfson. Fortas agreed to help, and he met with the Justice Department to discuss the case. However, his actions were criticized as unethical, and he was forced to withdraw his nomination to the Supreme Court in 1969, following a contentious confirmation hearing.
Another example of a defense attorney turning on their client is the case of Ronald Sullivan. Sullivan is a prominent defense attorney who has represented many high-profile clients, including Aaron Hernandez, the former NFL player who was convicted of murder in 2015. Sullivan was initially a staunch defender of Hernandez, maintaining his innocence and working tirelessly to secure his acquittal.
However, in 2019, Sullivan was removed from Hernandez’s defense team after the family of Hernandez’s victim, Odin Lloyd, accused Sullivan of betraying their trust. Sullivan had been hired to represent Lloyd’s family in a civil lawsuit against Hernandez, but they accused him of sharing confidential information and acting in the best interests of Hernandez, rather than their own.
The case of Ronald Sullivan highlights the delicate balance that defense attorneys must strike in representing their clients. While they are obligated to act in the best interests of their clients and to mount a strong defense, they must also be mindful of their ethical obligations and the expectations of other parties involved in the case.
Another example of a defense attorney turning on their client is the case of Michael Avenatti. Avenatti gained national attention for his representation of Stormy Daniels, an adult film actress who alleged that she had a sexual relationship with President Donald Trump. Avenatti became a frequent guest on cable news shows and was seen by many as a champion of the anti-Trump movement. However, Avenatti’s reputation came crashing down in 2019, when he was arrested and charged with extortion and wire fraud. The charges were related to his representation of Nike, which he had allegedly threatened to publicly accuse of wrongdoing unless they paid him and his client millions of dollars.
The case was a stunning reversal of fortune for Avenatti, who had been viewed by many as a hero of the anti-Trump movement. He was ultimately convicted of the charges in February 2020 and sentenced to 30 months in prison.
The case of Michael Avenatti highlights the dangers of lawyers becoming too closely aligned with their clients and losing sight of their ethical obligations. While defense attorneys are obligated to vigorously defend their clients and advocate for their interests, they must also be mindful of their obligations to the law and to the legal profession. In some cases, defense attorneys may turn on their clients as a result of conflicts of interest or personal beliefs. For example, a defense attorney who is strongly opposed to a particular crime may feel conflicted about representing a client who has been accused of that crime, and may therefore choose to turn down the case or withdraw from representation.
In other cases, a defense attorney may turn on their client as a result of pressure from other parties involved in the case. For example, a prosecutor may offer a plea deal or other incentive to a defense attorney in exchange for their cooperation or testimony against their client. While such actions are rare, they can have significant consequences for the client and for the attorney’s reputation.
As previously mentioned, the relationship between a defense attorney and their client is based on trust, confidentiality, and the expectation that the attorney will act in the best interests of their client. While conflicts and ethical dilemmas may arise in the course of a defense trial, it is essential that defense attorneys maintain their professional obligations and ethical responsibilities at all times, in order to best serve the interests of their clients and uphold the integrity of the legal profession.
While the vast majority of defense attorneys are committed to representing their clients to the best of their abilities, there have been instances where attorneys have turned on their clients, either by betraying their trust or taking actions that are contrary to their interests. These cases serve as a reminder of the importance of ethical conduct in the legal profession and the need for attorneys to maintain the trust and confidence of their clients at all times.
